MIM Material
Here Is The Good Intro About The MIM(metal injection molding)
There are several materials that can be used for MIM (Metal Injection Molding) process, some of the most commonly used materials include:
- Stainless steel: This is a popular material choice for MIM due to its excellent corrosion resistance and strength.
- Titanium: This high-strength material is often used in aerospace and medical applications.
- Cobalt-chrome: This metal alloy has excellent wear and corrosion resistance, making it ideal for use in orthopedic implants.
- Inconel: This nickel-based alloy is known for its high-temperature strength and corrosion resistance, making it ideal for use in aerospace and gas turbine applications.
- Copper: This material has excellent electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity, making it a popular choice for electronic components.
- Tungsten: This high-density metal is often used in weights and counterweights, as well as for radiation shielding.
- Aluminum: This lightweight metal is often used in automotive and aerospace applications.
- Magnesium: This lightweight metal is known for its high strength-to-weight ratio, making it ideal for use in aerospace and automotive applications.
- Nickel: This material is often used for its high-temperature strength and corrosion resistance, as well as for its magnetic properties.
- Zirconium: This material is known for its excellent corrosion resistance and biocompatibility, making it ideal for use in medical implants.
Main Application
MIM can be used to produce various complex metal parts for applications such as firearms, medical devices, aerospace, automotive, electronics, consumer goods, jewelry, and military equipment.
Fe-based alloys
Fe-2Ni, Fe-8Ni
Stainless steel
304, 316L, 17-4PH, 420, 440C
Hard alloy
WC-Co
Ceramic
Al2O3, ZrO2 , SiO2
IT electronic, daily necessary,Jewelry
Heavy alloy
W-Ni-Fe, W-Ni-Cu, W-Cu
Mikitary industry, communication Parts
Titanium alloy
Ti, Ti-6Al-4V
Magnetic material
Fe, Fe50Ni, Fe-Si
Tool steel
42CrMo4, M2
Tools
Copper alloy
MIM Material Properties
Material | Density | Hardness | Tensile strength | Elongation | |
g/cm 3 | Rockwell | MPa | % | ||
Fe-based alloys | MIM-2200 (Sintered) | 7.60 | 45HRB | 290 | 40 |
MIM-2700 (Sintered) | 7.60 | 69HRB | 440 | 26 | |
MIM-4605 (Sintered) | 7.60 | 62HRB | 415 | 15 | |
MIM-4605 (quench/temper) | 7.60 | 48HRC | 1655 | 2 | |
Stainless steel | MIM – 316L (Sintered) | 7.85 | 67HRB | 520 | 50 |
MIM- 17-4PH (Sintered) | 7.5 | 27HRC | 900 | 6 | |
MIM- 17-4PH (Heat Treated) | 7.5 | 40HRC | 1185 | 6 | |
MIM – 440C (Sintered) | 7.5 | 65HRB | 415 | 25 | |
Tungsten alloy | 95%W-Ni-Fe | 18.1 | 30 | 960 | 25 |
97%W-Ni-Fe | 18.5 | 33 | 940 | 15 | |
Fine ceramic | Al2O3 | 3.9 | HRA92 | 160 | – |
ZrO2 | 6.0 | HV1250 | – | – |
Stainless Steel
Material Element
316L | Iron | Nickel | Molybdenum | Silicon | Carbon | Chromium | Phosphorus | Manganese | Nitrogen | Sulfur |
Weight Ratio | BaL. | 10.00-14.00 | 2.00-3.00 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 16.00-18.00 | 0.045 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.03 |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Impact Strength | Hardness | Elongation(% in 25.4mm) |
316L | ≥7.85g/cm³ | ≥450 Mpa | ≥140Mpa | 190J | 100-150 HV10 | ≥40% |
Material Element
304 | Iron | Nickel | Silicon | Carbon | Chromium | Phosphorus | Manganese | Nitrogen | Sulfur |
Weight Ratio | BaL. | 8.00-11.00 | 1 | 0.08 | 18.00-20.00 | 0.035 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.03 |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation(% in 25.4mm) |
304 | ≥7.75g/cm³ | ≥480Mpa | ≥160Mpa | 100-150 HV10 | ≥40% |
Material Element
Stainless steel 420 | Iron | Silicon | Carbon | Chromium | Phosphorus | Manganese | Sulfur |
Weight Ratio | BaL. | 1 | 0.15 | 12.00-14.00 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.03 |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation(% in 25.4mm) |
420 | ≥7.55g/cm³ | ≥750Mpa | ≥600Mpa | 82J | 30-39HRC | ≥1% |
Material Element
Stainless steel 440C | Iron | Silicon | Carbon | Chromium | Manganese | Molybdenum |
Percent by Weight | BaL. | 1.00 | 0.95-1.2 | 16.00-18.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation(% in 25.4mm) |
Stainless steel 440C | ≥7.50g/cm³ | ≥700Mpa | ≥600Mpa | 115J | 30-39 HRC | ≥1% |
Material Element
Stainless Steel 17-4 PH | Iron | Nickel | Silicon | Carbon | Chromium | Niobium | Manganese | Copper | Sulfur |
Weight Ratio | BaL. | 3.00-5.00 | 1 | 0.07 | 15.50-17.50 | 0.15-0.45 | 1 | 3.00-5.00 | 0.03 |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation(% in 25.4mm) |
Stainless Steel 17-4 PH (Sintered) | ≥7.65g/cm³ | ≥950Mpa | 730Mpa | 140J | 25~30 HRC | ≥3% |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation(% in 25.4mm) |
stainless steel 17-4 PH H900 | 7.7g/cm³ | 1206Mpa | 1089Mpa | 140J | 40HRC | 9% |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation(% in 25.4mm) |
Stainless steel 17-4 PH H1100 | 7.7g/cm³ | 1000Mpa | 910Mpa | 140J | 34HRC | 12% |
Low Alloy Steel
As a result of its exceptional strength and good ductility, MIM 4605 is widely used in the automotive, consumer products, and hand tool industries.
Element
MIM-4605 | Iron | Silicon | Carbon | Nickel | Molybdenum |
Weight Ratio | BaL. | 1 | 0.40-0.60 | 1.50-2.50 | 0.20-0.50 |
Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
MIM-4605 | ≥7.50g/cm³ | ≥600Mpa | ≥400Mpa | 70J | ≥90 HV10 | ≥5% |
4605 Low Hardness Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
MIM-4605 | ≥7.5g/cm³ | 1151Mpa | 1034Mpa | 38J | 36 HRC | ≥3% |
4605 High Hardness Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
MIM-4605 | ≥7.5g/cm³ | 1655Mpa | 1480Mpa | 55J | 48 HRC | ≥2% |
Element
MIM Fe02Ni | Iron | Carbon | Nickel | Sulfur | Phosphorus |
Percent by Weight | BaL. | 0.40-0.60 | 1.50-2.50 | 0.00-0.03 | 0.00-0.035 |
Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
MIM Fe02Ni | ≥7.55g/cm³ | ≥260Mpa | ≥150Mpa | ≥90 HV10 | ≥3% |
Element
Fe04Ni | Iron | Carbon | Nickel | Sulfur | Phosphorus |
Percent by Weight | BaL. | 0.40-0.60 | 3.00-5.00 | 0.00-0.03 | 0.00-0.035 |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
Fe04Ni | ≥7.60g/cm³ | ≥630Mpa | ≥380Mpa | ≥90 HV10 | ≥3% |
Element
MIM Fe08Ni | Iron | Carbon | Nickel | Sulfur | Phosphorus |
Percent by Weight | BaL. | 0.40-0.60 | 7.0-9.0 | 0.00-0.03 | 0.00-0.035 |
Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
MIM Fe08Ni | ≥7.65g/cm³ | 630Mpa | ≥400Mpa | ≥90 HV10 | 3% |
.Element
Fe03Si | Iron | Silicon | Carbon | RoHS Compliant |
Percent by Weight | BaL. | 2.5-3.5 | 0.05 | Yes |
Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
Fe03Si | ≥7.55g/cm³ | 227Mpa | 151Mpa | 100-180HV10 | 24% |
Element
Fe50Ni | Iron | Nickel | Silicon | Carbon | RoHS Compliant |
Percent by Weight | Bal. | 49.00-51.00 | 1.00 | 0.01 | Yes |
Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) | Permeability | Magnetization Intensity |
Fe50Ni | ≥7.85g/cm³ | 468Mpa | 165Mpa | 110-160 HV10 | 30% | μmax =28000 | Js(4Ka/m)=1.36T |
Element
Fe50Co | Iron | Chromium | Cobalt | Manganese | Silicon | Carbon |
Percent by Weight | Bal. | 0.0-0.2 | 49-51 | 0.0-0.3 | 0.0-0.3 | 0.04 |
Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) | Permeability | Magnetization Intensity |
Fe50Co | ≥7.95g/cm³ | ≥300Mpa | ≥180Mpa | 80HRB | 1% | μmax =5200 | Js(4Ka/m)=2.0T |
Element
Ti-6Al-4V | Titanium | Aluminum | Vanadium | Iron | Carbon |
Percent by Weight | Balance | 5.5-6.75 | 3.50-4.50 | 0.30 | 0.08 |
Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
Ti-6Al-4V | 4.5g/cm³ | 950Mpa | 920Mpa | 36 HRC | 18% |
High requirement on the electrical conductivity and corrosion resistance
Material | Density | Marco |
Nickel alloy | 8.6g/cm³ | 53 HRC |
Element
ASTM F15 | Iron | Nickel | Molybdenum | Silicon | Carbon | Chromium | Cobalt | Copper | Niobium | Magnesium | Titanium | Zirconium | Aluminum | RoHS Compliant |
Percent by Weight | BaL. | 29 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.2 | 17 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Yes |
Mechanical Properties
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
ASTM F15 | 7.7g/cm³ | 450Mpa | 305Mpa | 65 HRB | 25% |
Element
ASTM F75 | Iron | Nickel | Molybdenum | Silicon | Carbon | Chromium | Cobalt | RoHS Compliant |
Percent by Weight | 0.75 | 1.0 | 5.00-7.00 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 26-30 | BaL. | Yes |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
ASTM F75 | 8.3g/cm³ | 992Mpa | 551Mpa | 177J | 25 HRC | 30% |
Element
ASTM F1537 | Iron | Nickel | Molybdenum | Silicon | Carbon | Chromium | Cobalt | Niobium | RoHS Compliant |
Percent by Weight | 0.75 | 0.25 | 5.00-7.00 | 1.00 | 0.10-0.35 | 26-30 | BaL. | 1.00 | Yes |
Material | Density | Tensile Strength | Yield Strength(0.2%) | ImpactStrength | Hardness | Elongation (% in 25.4mm) |
ASTM F1537 | 8.3g/cm³ | 1103Mpa | 85Mpa | 80J | 32 HRC | 27% |
MIM Material Density
Mechanical Properties
The characteristic of the tensile is almost the same as cnc or casting or other process.
Corrosion Resistance
Cause the chrome is degrade when sintering process.We could use the right post-sintering and surface treatment to get a better corrosion resistance.
Bio-compatibility
More and more industrial need bio-compatibility,such as medical ,and dental device,We recommend the post-sintering and electrical chemical treament to cover the mim parts for bio-compatibility.
F.A.Q.
MIM Material
The MIM process, also known as Metal Injection Molding, is a manufacturing technique used to produce complex metal parts with high precision and intricate shapes. It combines the advantages of plastic injection molding and powder metallurgy to create near-net-shape components.
Here’s a simplified step-by-step overview of the MIM process:
1. Feedstock Preparation: Fine metal powders, typically less than 20 microns in size, are mixed with a binder material. The binder helps hold the metal powder particles together and allows them to be injected into the mold.
2. Injection Molding: The feedstock, now in the form of a paste-like material, is injected into a mold cavity using a specialized injection molding machine. The mold is typically made of steel and has the desired shape of the final part.
3. Debinding: After the component has been molded, it undergoes a debinding process to remove the binder material. This can be done through either a solvent-based or thermal debinding method, where the binder is selectively removed while leaving the metal powder intact.
4. Sintering: The debound component is then subjected to a sintering process. In this step, the component is heated in a controlled atmosphere to a temperature just below its melting point. The heat causes the metal particles to fuse together, resulting in a fully dense and solid metal part.
5. Post-Processing: After sintering, additional post-processing steps may be performed to achieve specific surface finishes, improve dimensional accuracy, or add further treatments like heat treatment or coating.
The MIM process offers several advantages, including the ability to produce complex, near-net-shape parts with high dimensional accuracy, excellent surface finish, and a range of material options such as stainless steel, titanium, and cobalt-chrome. It is widely used in various industries, including automotive, medical, aerospace, electronics, and consumer goods.
MIM (Metal Injection Molding) part density refers to the mass per unit volume of a component produced through the metal injection molding process. It represents the amount of material that is present in a specific volume of the final part.
The density of MIM parts can vary depending on several factors, including the material used, the process parameters, and the design of the part itself. Generally, MIM parts have high densities ranging from 95% to 99% of the theoretical density of the material being used.
Achieving high part density is crucial in MIM because it directly affects the mechanical properties and performance of the final component. Higher density typically results in improved strength, hardness, and other mechanical properties. This is because a denser part has fewer voids or defects within its structure, leading to better overall integrity.
Manufacturers use various techniques and optimization strategies during the MIM process to achieve high part density. These may include carefully controlling the feedstock formulation, refining the injection molding parameters, optimizing the debinding and sintering steps, and implementing quality control measures to ensure consistent part density.
In summary, MIM part density refers to the mass per unit volume of a component manufactured using metal injection molding and plays a vital role in determining the mechanical properties and performance of the final product.
Sintering is a critical step in the Metal Injection Molding (MIM) process, where the shaped green parts are subjected to high temperatures to bond the metal particles together and achieve the desired density and mechanical properties.
During the sintering process, the green parts are placed in a furnace and heated to a temperature below the melting point of the metal used in the MIM process. The exact temperature and time depend on the specific material being processed.
As the temperature increases, several key phenomena occur during sintering:
1. Densification: As the temperature rises, the metal particles start to diffuse and come into contact with each other. This diffusion allows for the removal of voids and the welding of adjacent particles, resulting in densification of the part.
2. Neck Formation: Sintering promotes the formation of “necks” between the metal particles. These necks are small regions where adjacent particles are bonded together, forming a continuous solid structure.
3. Shrinkage: During sintering, the green parts undergo shrinkage due to the removal of binder materials and the rearrangement of metal particles. The extent of shrinkage depends on the material formulation and sintering conditions.
4. Grain Growth: Grain growth occurs when the metal particles grow in size during sintering. This can affect the final microstructure and mechanical properties of the part.
The sintering process requires careful control of temperature, time, and atmosphere to optimize the densification while minimizing deformations, distortions, and defects. Typically, protective atmospheres such as nitrogen or hydrogen are used to prevent oxidation and maintain the integrity of the metal.
After sintering, additional post-processing steps such as heat treatment, machining, and surface finishing may be performed to enhance the final properties and aesthetics of the MIM parts.
In summary, sintering in MIM is the process of heating the green parts to a temperature below the metal’s melting point, allowing for the bonding and densification of the metal particles to form the final solid component.
The main difference between casting and Metal Injection Molding (MIM) lies in the manufacturing processes and the properties of the final products. Here are the key distinctions:
1. Process: Casting involves pouring molten metal into a mold, allowing it to solidify and then removing the mold to obtain the final product. MIM, on the other hand, utilizes a powder metallurgy process where a mixture of fine metal powders and binders is injected into a mold. The molded part is then subjected to a debinding and sintering process to remove the binders and consolidate the metal powders.
2. Complexity: MIM is generally more suitable for complex geometries and intricate shapes compared to casting. The injection molding process allows for the production of parts with fine details, thin walls, and complex features, which can be challenging to achieve through traditional casting methods.
3. Material Variety: Casting can accommodate a wide range of materials, including various metals and alloys, while MIM is primarily used for smaller parts made from materials such as stainless steel, low-alloy steel, and other related materials. MIM offers a limited material selection compared to casting.
4. Mechanical Properties: MIM parts generally exhibit higher density and better mechanical properties compared to cast parts. The sintering process in MIM allows for the achievement of high part densities, resulting in improved strength, hardness, and dimensional accuracy. Cast parts may have lower density and can exhibit inherent defects, such as porosity or shrinkage, which can affect their mechanical performance.
5. Cost: For large-scale production runs, MIM can offer cost advantages over casting due to its ability to produce net-shaped parts with less material waste. However, for simpler, larger parts or low-volume production, casting may be a more cost-effective option.
Ultimately, the choice between casting and MIM depends on various factors, including part complexity, material requirements, desired properties, and production volume. Each method has its strengths and limitations, and selecting the appropriate manufacturing process depends on the specific needs of the application.